Legal Opinion

Comar Oil Co. v. Sibley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1927No. 18084PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is an original action brought in this court by petitioners to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, made on the 10th day of December, 1926. Roy Sibley, respondent, was awarded the sum of $2,000 for serious, permanent facial disfigurement.

Nine assignments of error are contained in the petition of petitioners. Four assignments of error are argued in petitioners’ brief. The first one is as to the admissibility of evidence offered before the Commission that respondent could not properly masticate. This was a trial to determine what award should be made for a serious and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seneca Coal Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Arrow Gasoline Co. v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elkins v. LallierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Brunstetter Motor Co. v. BrunstetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Caddo County v. HartmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API