Legal Opinion

Walker v. Big Lost River Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. 19792PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a water rights case. The trial court granted a writ of mandate and a permanent injunction compelling the Big Lost River Irrigation District (BLRID) to deliver stored water outside of BLRID’s boundaries. The trial court also granted Walker damages as a result of BLRID’s failure to deliver water.

We conclude that the trial court lacked jurisdiction in this case, because the case required the trial court to determine the right to the use of water, which may only be addressed as part of the Snake River Basin Adjudication (SRBA).

1

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

BLRID…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Snake River Basin Water SystemIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bear Island Water Ass'n, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Devil Creek Ranch, Inc. v. Cedar Mesa Reservoir & Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Idaho Conservation League, Inc. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re SRBA Case No. 39576 (Subcase 91-63) / Gene F. Bray v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API