Legal Opinion
United States v. Henry S. Fuller and Robert Duane Foster
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 12, 1993No. 91-5799PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLE, District Judge:
Henry Silas Fuller and Robert Duane Foster were convicted of conspiracy to launder money. Fuller was also convicted of attempting to launder money. In their appeal, Foster and Fuller assert that the evidence, some of which was wrongfully admitted, was insufficient to support guilty verdicts. The appellants also suggest reversible error in the district court’s submission of an instruction on deliberate ignorance. Finally, appellants contest the district court’s determination of the sum subject to the offence. This error resulted in an enhanced sentence. Finding no merit…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Leonard Orozco BuenrostroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Uriel Lara-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. KroutCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. ThreadgillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Thomas R. MullensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Andy Restrepo and Gustavo Bedoya NaranjoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.