Legal Opinion

Caciano Garcia Mendez, et al. v. Laura Hermosillo, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 26, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02560Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 CACIANO GARCIA MENDEZ, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-02560-TMC 8 Petitioners, ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION 9 FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES v. 10 LAURA HERMOSILLO, et al., 11 Respondents. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Petitioners obtained habeas relief when this Court held they had been unlawfully subject 16 to mandatory immigration detention without an opportunity for bond. Dkt. 21. Their group 17 habeas petition was brought to enforce the declaratory judgment entered in Rodriguez Vazquez v. 18 Bostock, 802 F. Supp. 3d 1297,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United Steelworkers v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API