Legal Opinion

Huxoll v. McAlister's Body & Frame, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2004No. WD 62218PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

James Huxoll sued McAlister’s Body & Frame, Inc. (“Body Shop”) for injuries he sustained while visiting McAlister’s shop for the purpose of servicing his vending machines. Huxoll suffered the injuries when he opened a locked back door and attempted to step over a pile of scrap metal. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the Body Shop. Huxoll appeals arguing that he made a submissible case. We affirm.

Factual Background

The facts are recited in a light favorable to the plaintiff. Thong v. My River Home Harbour, Inc., 8 S.W.3d 373, 377 (Mo.App.1999). James Huxoll owned a company that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. NiehausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. In Re Turner Bros. Trucking Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Hellmann v. Droege's Super Market, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Cochran v. Burger King Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crow v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Holzhausen v. HolzhausenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Rapp v. Eagle Plumbing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Caulfield v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
  5. John C. Rapp v. Eagle Plumbing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API