Legal Opinion

Town of Cortlandt v. New York Central Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Reargument of submission of a controversy pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (See 171 App. Div. 921.)

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, P. J.:

This is a submitted controversy which presents the sole question whether it is the duty of the defendant to repair the roadway of a certain bridge. Before September 28, 1905, there was a public highway in the town of Cortlandt which crossed defendant’s right of way and was carried over defendant’s tracks by a bridge. Such bridge was constructed and used for several years prior to January 1, 1897. In September, 1905, the local authorities of the town permitted the defendant to make a temporary change of such overhead crossing. Between 1906 and 1910, at the instance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bush v. . D., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. City of Yonkers v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Matter of City of New York v. . the New York Central Rd.New York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Mount Vernon v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. In re HennerNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of Mount Vernon v. FeinbergNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API