Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pocono Mountain School District v. Pennsylvania Department of Education

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2016No. 87 MAP 2015Published

1DissentJustice Dougherty

I join Justice Baer’s dissent and write to express some additional observations. In my view, Section 8327(b)(2) of the Public School Employees’ Retirement Code (Retirement Code), 24 Pa.C.S. § 8327(b)(2), need not be read in pari materia with Section 1729-A(i) of the Charter School Law (CSL), 24 P.S. § 17-1729-A(i), because the statutes address different subjects: one provides a payment mechanism for PSERS contributions, Section 8327(b)(2), and one describes the protocols for closure of charter schools, Section 1729-A(i). I recognize that both provisions address charter schools. However,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pocono Mountain Charter School, Inc. v. Pocono Mountain School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API