Legal Opinion

Luce v. City of Bristow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1925No. 16010Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, C.

The plaintiff in error commenced this action in the superior court of Sapulpa to enjoin the defendant and its officers from enforcing a certain ordinance of said city, regulating the licensing of pool halls in said city.

Upon the filing of the petition the court granted a temporary injunction. Later on, upon motion of the defendant in error, the trial court dissolved the temporary injunction, and from this order the plaintiff in error has appealed to this court.

Since the appeal was filed in this court, the ordinance attacked in the proceedings has been repealed, -and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massey v. School Dist. No. 58Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Gilbert v. DivelblissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API