Legal Opinion
United States v. Christopher Kelley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2015No. 14-1249PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
On the morning Christopher Kelley’s arson trial was to begin, Kelley moved for substitute counsel or, alternatively, to proceed pro se. The district court 1 denied the motion. At trial, a jury found Kelley guilty on both arson counts. Kelley directly appealed the district court’s orders regarding his representation at trial. We affirmed in part and, retaining jurisdiction, remanded to the district court for clarification of the denial of Kelley’s motion to proceed pro se. See United States v. Kelley, 774 F.3d 434, 442 (8th Cir.2014) (Kelley I). On remand, the district court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Mary K. EdelmannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Richard Bilauski v. Troy SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Christopher KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Anthony AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Elliott Finch, Jr. v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Kelvin WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Robert MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Roman HarlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.