Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gifford v. Miller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1968No. Appeal, 989Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Wright, P. J.:

I respectfully dissent.

*277In Commonwealth ex rel. Golembewski v. Stanley, 205 Pa. Superior Ct. 101, 208 A. 2d 49, in an opinion by the writer, the majority of our court as then constituted held that, as a matter of law, a putative father was not entitled to limited custody of an illegitimate child. It was our view that the best interest and permanent welfare of an illegitimate child dictated that all contact between it and the putative father should be terminated. However, the Golembewski case was overruled by a majority of our court as subsequently constituted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Harry v. EastridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Gwiszcz AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Golembewski v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API