Legal Opinion

Davis v. Reagen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1980No. 80-1246Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Robert Davis, et al., plaintiffs-appellees, move to recall the mandate previously issued in this case, see Davis v. Reagen, 630 F.2d 1299 (8th Cir. 1980), so that we may consider their application for attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses for appellate work performed in this civil rights case. In an earlier application to the district court, the court denied relief, stating:

The Court does not believe it proper for the trial court to consider fees to be allowed for appellate work and has not included any allowance for such work. Plaintiff may make application to the Circuit Court of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 352, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,392 Walee Abdul Hameed Lonnie Vanderson George Coe Willie M. Nichols Johnnie J. Brown Hiawatha Davis Willie West v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Local Union No. 396 and Ironworkers Joint Apprenticeship Committee of St. Louis, Missouri, National Iron Workers and Employer Training Program, Walee Abdul Hameed Lonnie Vanderson George Coe Willie M. Nichols Johnnie J. Brown Hiawatha Davis Willie West v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Local Union No. 396, Ironworkers Joint Apprenticeship Committee of St. Louis, Missouri, National Iron Workers and Employer Training ProgramCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Davis v. ReagenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API