Legal Opinion

United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Eighty-Six Firearms and Twenty-Two Rounds of Ammunition, Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1980No. 78-1500, 78-1544PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an action under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) to forfeit firearms. The lower court found that respondent, a licensed firearms dealer, had unlawfully sold handguns to undercover agents on two separate occasions. The court failed to find, however, that respondent would have done the same with the long guns in the shop. See I Rec. at 160-63. The lower court thus ordered forfeiture of the handguns but not the long guns. Respondent appeals, challenging the forfeiture of the handguns. The government cross-appeals the failure to order forfeiture of the long guns. We affirm as to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dale Paul Glup v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. One Assortment of 12 Rifles & 21 HandgunsDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1970
  3. United States v. 1,922 Assorted FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, National Rifle Association of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, National Rifle Association of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. One Assortment of Seven FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API