Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Hobbs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1904No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kalkaska; Chittenden, J. Trover by Mary M. Haynes, administratrix of the. estate of James S. Haynes, deceased, against Miller Hobbs. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is trover, brought against the assignee of an instrument claimed to be a mortgage. The plaintiff recovered the value of the excess of the property over and above the amount secured, and defendant brings error.

Plaintiff’s intestate, James S. Haynes, being indebted to divers parties, in June, 1900, gave a bill of sale of his horses, wagons, and livery stock to two of such creditors, Howard Price & Co. and George F. Bow. The bill of sale was in the ordinary form, but contained in addition the following statement and defeasance:

“This bill of sale is given to secure the said second parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brink v. FreoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Card v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malone v. KugelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API