Legal Opinion
Wagenheim v. Willcox
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 2, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 N.J. Super. 263 (1969)
251 A.2d 781
HELEN S. WAGENHEIM AND HARRY H. WAGENHEIM, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
J. TANEY WILLCOX, JR., CATHERINE E. WILLCOX, HIS WIFE, AND ROBERT E. RITTERHOFF, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided April 2, 1969.
Mr. Nathan C. Staller for plaintiffs (Messrs. Staller, Hayman & Gorelick, attorneys).
Mr. W.M. Balliette, Jr. for defendants (Messrs. Cafiero and Balliette, attorneys).
HORN, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek a mandatory injunction to compel defendants Willcox, likewise husband and wife, and their builder Robert E.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meaney v. StorkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
- Gilpin v. Jacob Ellis Realties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Javna v. DJ Fredricks, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Ocean City Land Co. v. WeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
- Supplee v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roehrs v. LeesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Courts at Beachgate v. BirdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Berger v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976