Legal Opinion

Mallory v. Hartman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action against the surety upon a bond given to secure the dissolution of an attachment, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County, Scott, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $311, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

On the 17th day of August, 1911, the plaintiff, as a constable of the town of Milford, attached certain personal property, then in that town, claimed to be the property of the Bridgeport Aeronautical Company, in a suit instituted by Topping and Kerr. The Bridgeport Aeronautical Company at this time had an office and its principal place of business in the town of Milford.

To.procure the release of this property this Company conveyed and delivered all of the property of which it was possessed to the defendant in the present case. Thereupon the Company, as principal, with Hartman, as surety,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. President, Directors & Co. of the Mechanics Bank v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  2. Birdsall v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Porter v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perri v. CioffiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. West v. H. J. Lewis Oyster Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Quinlan v. City National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Hartwell v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Whitney Frocks, Inc. v. JaffeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API