Legal Opinion
State v. Fasching
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1990No. Crim. 890196PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
We consider whether custodial interrogation without a Miranda warning requires suppression of all evidence, testimonial and non-testimonial. We hold that only testimonial evidence must be suppressed. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s suppression of all evidence gathered after the custodial interrogation began.
At 12:26 A.M. on January 1, 1989, Morton County Deputy Sheriff Duane Snider observed a car accelerate rapidly onto Interstate 94 and, while following it, saw it “wander” in its lane several times. He stopped the car driven by Julie Fasching.
Deputy Snider approached…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. GenreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RitterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HaibeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- McNamara v. Director of North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.