Legal Opinion

Landrum v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1932No. 15072Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— An examination of the record in the light of the motion for rehearing leaves us of the opinion that the former decision was correct.

The point raised in the motion is that the testimony of the sheriff identifying the bottle of whisky which was produced upon the trial as the one which he had received from the appellant was improperly received. We think the matter was properly disposed of in the original opinion. See McDonough v. State, 118 Texas Crim. Rep., 301, 39 S. W. (2d) 886; Kelly v. State, 102 Texas Crim. Rep., 395, 278 S. W., 449.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. McDonough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API