Legal Opinion

McCracken v. Harned

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 25, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On contract. On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

This ease was submitted to the jury by the trial justice upon a basis not warranted by the evidence. ’

The claim of the plaintiff was that in July, 1891, he had loaned the defendant $3,000, and in October, 1891, had received from him ten thousand shares of stock as collateral security for the loan; that in November, 1891, he had loaned the defendant $2,000 more, and then the defendant had handed him the writing of November 6th, 1891, as a proposition for him to consider. This writing is as follows:

“Nov. 6, ’91.
“Whereas, Alpheus McCracken holds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. DaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Hill v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fuchs v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API