Legal Opinion
Berry v. Fun Time Pool and Spa, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 18, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01610Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BRANT BERRY, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:20-cv-1610 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura FUN TIME POOL AND SPA, INCORPORATED, et. al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER The matter before the Court is Plaintiff Brant Berry’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees and Costs (ECF No. 14). The time has passed to file a response and Defendant has not responded. Thus, the motion is ripe for review. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. I. Plaintiff filed this case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reed v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Local 307 v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Fegley v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.