Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Peck

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1834PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Greene Circuit Cowr£ — Before the. Hon. H. W. Collier. „ This was a debt on a penal bend. Michael Kinnard, Frederick Peck, and George Seaton, made their bond to Pitkin Barnes^ which, after reciting in the condition thereof, that the said Kinnard had entered'into certain mortgages of sundry slaves to the said Barnes — stipulated, that if Kinnard should well and truly deliver to said Barnes, the negroes mentioned in said mortgages, together with reasonable wages for…

Read the full summary

Error from Greene Circuit Cowr£ — Before the. Hon. H. W. Collier. „ This was a debt on a penal bend. Michael Kinnard, Frederick Peck, and George Seaton, made their bond to Pitkin Barnes^ which, after reciting in the condition thereof, that the said Kinnard had entered'into certain mortgages of sundry slaves to the said Barnes — stipulated, that if Kinnard should well and truly deliver to said Barnes, the negroes mentioned in said mortgages, together with reasonable wages for their hire, until, the mortgages - should be foreclosed by bill in equity, (provided equity should decree the property…

1Opinion of the Court

By Mr. Justice Thornton :.

This was an action of debt, brought by the plaintiff in error upon a penal bond, executed by the defendants George Sea-' ton and Michael Kinnard, to the plaintiff, for the penal sum of four thousand dollars, which bond contained the following condition, viz : “ Now, the condition of the above obligation is such, that whereas the above bounden Michael Kinnard did, on the 18th September, 1820, make and deliver unto said Pitkin Barnes, a mortgage for the following negroes, (naming them,) which negroes were mortgaged to the said Barnes, for and in consideration of twelve…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API