E. E. Black, Limited v. Alsup
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant (herein called the taxpayer) sued for the recovery of excess profits taxes for the year 1945 alleged to have been erroneously and illegally assessed and collected. The appeal is from a judgment denying recovery.
The facts are not in dispute. Taxpayer is a building contractor in Hawaii. Since its incorporation in 1926 it has consistently made its Federal tax returns on the “completed contract basis” pursuant to Regulation 111, section 29.42-4 (b) promulgated under 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 41 and 42. So far as material here the regulation reads:
“Sec. 29.42-4. Long-Term…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rice, Barton &. Fales, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thompson-King-Tate, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Guy F. Atkinson Company of California and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Daley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- C. H. Leavell & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.