Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Asia Optical Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 23, 2015No. 11cv6036 (DLC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
DENISE COTE, District Judge.
The plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) won a judgment in this Court against the defendant Asia Optical Co., Inc. (“AO”) in 2012. In 2014, AO brought suit against Kodak in China to obtain reimbursement of money it paid to Kodak pursuant to that judgment. Kodak now seeks an anti-suit injunction against AO to halt the Chinese lawsuit. For the following reasons, Kodak’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The factual background of this case is laid out in several Opinions of this Court, including in the March 16, 2012 Opinion granting partial summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- George Personis and Jean G. Personis v. Robert Oiler and Douglas K. Abel LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In Re Millenium Seacarriers, Inc., Debtors. Jamaica Shipping Company Limited v. Orient Shipping Rotterdam, B v. in Re Millenium Baltic, Inc., Debtor. Orient Shipping Rotterdam, B v. V. Jamaica Shipping Company LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Mendes Junior International Company v. Banco Do Brasil, S.A. And Bb Leasing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Applied Medical Distribution Corp. v. Surgical Co. BVCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wta Tour, Inc. v. Super Slam Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Alfandary v. Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Zoetis, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Zoetis, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Zoetis, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022