Legal Opinion

Boice v. Warnstedt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 2, 1997No. 96-2420PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse an order granting Appellee’s motion to quash service of process and vacating a default and final judgment for lack of jurisdiction over the person.

The record reflects that notwithstanding faulty service, and after entry of the default judgment, Appellee appeared by counsel, who filed an appearance and moved for relief from the default and judgment without questioning service of process. The default was entered in August, 1995. In September, Ap-pellee filed his first motion to set aside the default. This motion was rejected and the judgment was entered. Appellee’s counsel then filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cumberland Software, Inc. v. GREAT AM. MORTG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. CONSOLIDATED ALUMINIUM CORP. v. WeinrothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. EGF Tampa Associates v. BohlenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Fundaro v. Canadiana Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Bay City Management, Inc. v. HendersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. LaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API