Legal Opinion

Farley v. Hiers ex rel. Blount

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1996No. 95-1128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends the trial court erred in determining that appellee has a prescriptive easement to continue the use of a well, pump, and pump house located on appellant’s property. We affirm.

In 1954, the Blounts subdivided property known as Blount’s Camp No. 2, and at about the same time, installed a well, pump, and pump house on the southeastern corner of Lot 23 and began providing water service for profit under the name of Blounts’ Water System. Although the Blounts did not retain ownership of any portion of Lot 23, they have operated the water system openly and continuously since 1954.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Downing v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Burdine v. SewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Florida Power Corporation v. McNeelyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. O'CONNOR v. BrodieMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Crescent Harbor Water Co. v. LysengCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Farish v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API