Robinson v. Jones
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 144, Jan. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from judgment from C. P. Lancaster Co., Dec, T., 1907, No. 23, on case stated in suit of George W. Robinson v. Howard Jones. Case stated to' determine the marketable title to real estate. Before Hassler, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.- Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant on the case stated.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
There was no error in holding that the testator’s children took estates in fee under the following clause in his will: “ I give, bequeath and devise all the rest, residue and remainder of my real and personal estate to my other three children, viz. : Elizabeth Miller, Sarah Jane Miller and Joseph 'P. Miller, equally, share and share alike. In case any one or more of my last named children — wishes her, or his or their money out of said estate, it is my will that they choose three disinterested persons to appraise said estate at cash value. It is my will and desire that if either —…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mickley's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Mitchell v. Pittsburg, Fort Wayne & Chicago Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Richards v. BentzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crumley v. ScalesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Field's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920