Legal Opinion

United States of America, Ex Rel. Phil Shaw v. Richard De Robertis, Warden and Neil Hartigan, Illinois Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 20, 1985No. 84-1380PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of a writ of habeas corpus to Phil Shaw, a prisoner at Stateville Correctional Center, Joliet, Illinois, on grounds that the prosecutor’s improper comment during closing argument concerning a police report not admitted into evidence deprived Shaw of a fair trial, in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 581 F.Supp. 1397. We affirm.

I

On March 14, 1978, just before closing his liquor store on the south side of Chicago at approximately 2:00 a.m., Edward Lewis let two men into the store, one of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States Ex Rel. Charles Clark v. James FikeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Eugene Fearns, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Frank Olmos CastenadaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. LightyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. Adrian Hennon v. Keith Cooper, Warden, Joliet Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Joseph Rodriguez v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Department of Corrections, State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API