Legal Opinion

Hatch v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 30, 1996No. 05-93-00928-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAPMAN, Justice.

Appellant appeals his jury conviction for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at twenty years’ confinement. In his sole point of error, appellant contends his conviction is invalid because the verdict was returned by less than twelve jurors. We reverse and remand.

After appellant’s trial began, but before the charge was read to the jury, the trial court learned that one of the jurors was not a United States citizen. The State and appellant agreed the juror should be disqualified and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Ex Parte HernandezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. MacKey and Grice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Timmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  3. Landry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998
  4. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Hatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API