Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Cox

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1942No. 31230PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessm.ore, J.

This is an action on a contract, originally brought in the justice of the peace court, and from a dismissal of the plaintiff’s case was appealed to the district court. The contract sued on was in the sum of $345.80, entered into July 29, 1936, and was for the sale of six and one-half tons of “Hóg Fatena Meal,” a product manufactured by the plaintiff as a tested, scientific hog feed. The contract contained a promissory note, to be paid on or before February 1, 1937, and provided that the meal was to be fed to 22 hogs, owned by the defendant, clear and free of all liens, and to be marketed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fritsche v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Saffer v. SafferNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Giles v. HornerNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Flynn & Larsen Implement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Washington v. DrakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Yoder v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. DE KALB HYBRID SEED COMPANY v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Bauer v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API