Legal Opinion

Dur-Ram Packaging Devices, Ltd. v. Self-Seal Containers, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1969No. Docket 4,869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

Plaintiff, a Canadian corporation not licensed to do business in Michigan, grants franchises or licenses to manufacture a mailing tube device, generally known as “Tube-O-Gram.” The device is patented in Canada and the United States. In March, 1966, plaintiff participated in a franchise show at Cobo Hall in Detroit, where defendants Bringer and McKee became interested in the product. Plaintiff provided a booklet entitled, “Invitation to Opportunity,” which outlined a hypothetical set-up, indicating possible needed personnel, probable production, and estimated profit from operating a franchise.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. U. S. Fibres, Inc. v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
  2. Convergent Group Corp. v. County of KentDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Long Manufacturing Co. v. Wright-Way Farm Service, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Long Manufacturing Co. v. Wright-Way Farm Service, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. U. S. Fibres, Inc. v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API