Legal Opinion

Krebs v. Raborg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from two orders of Special Term. Defendants are husband and wife. The first order grants the husband’s motion to vacate a judgment entered against him on default and gives him leave to answer. The second order denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the wife. We believe both of these dispositions to be erroneous.

The motion to open the default is addressed to the discretion of the court. To succeed defendant must establish a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense (Back v. Stern, 23 A D 2d 837; Levine v. Fal-Bar Argentinian Corner Restaurant, 18 A D 2d…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Harding v. New York State Teamsters Council Welfare Trust FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. United Industrial Corp. v. ShreiberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc. v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Gamache v. AhernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API