Piedmont Ford Truck Sale, Inc. v. City of Greensboro
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Plaintiffs bring forth as their sole assignment of error the trial court’s dismissal of their amended complaint pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs contend that sufficient legal bases exist to sustain each of four separate claims for relief. To be legally sufficient, a claim must show on its face that there is no insurmountable bar to recovery and that the pleadings give the adverse party notice of the events giving rise to the claim so that the party understands the nature of the claim and is able to answer the allegations in the complaint and prepare for trial.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Supervisors v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re Annexation Ordinance D-21927 Adopted by City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- R. R. v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brantley v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994