Legal Opinion

Cambist Films, Inc. v. Duggan

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1969No. Civ. A. 69-300PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

Plaintiff holds United States and Canadian rights for distribution of an Argentine motion picture film entitled “The Female”, of which it owns 70 prints. In general 25 or more are in simultaneous use, but about once a year all 70 would be needed. This action is brought under the “Ku Klux Act” of April 20, 1871, 17 Stat. 13, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 to recover five prints seized without a warrant of any kind by law enforcement authorities in Allegheny County and Westmoreland County. 2 Plaintiff invokes the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Goocher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Entertainment Ventures, Inc. v. BrewerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969
  3. Cambist Films, Inc. v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Bryers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Cambist Films, Inc., a Corporation v. Robert W. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API