Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 2003No. 2D-02-809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

We review a conviction and sentence following revocation of Nathaniel Earl Robinson’s probation. Mr. Robinson asserts that there was insufficient evidence for the trial court to find that he violated conditions five and seven of his probation. We agree and reverse.

The amended affidavit of violation of probation first alleged that Mr. Robinson tested positive for cannabinoid. The State called Mr. Robinson’s probation officer, Troy B. Miller, who testified that he took a urine sample from Mr. Robinson and shipped it to PharmChem Laboratory for analysis. Over a hearsay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gammon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Soto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. C.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Queior v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API