Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bilbrey v. Strahorn

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 9, 1927Published

1Dissent

Adkins, J.,

filed the following dissenting opinion:

While I do not understand that the majority of the court agree that is so, it seems to me that the full purport of their decision must be that, whenever a second sale is found necessary upon any one of the possible grounds of exception to a sale, after report of foreclosure under a power, it must be made by the court as vendor, and no longer under the power of sale with its ordinary incidents, upon which the proceeding started and has been based up to that time. For either the resale is made under the power, with all the freedom which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hadaway v. HynsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Reeside v. PeterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Boteler v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1835

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API