Legal Opinion

Jeudy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 2017No. 4D16-1586Published

1Per curiam

Junior Jeudy appeals the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We accept the State’s concession on appellant’s first claim, and we remand for the trial court to correct appellant’s judgment to conform to the jury’s verdict that he was guilty of attempted carjacking and false imprisonment. The appellant need not be present for the correction. See Wiggins v. State, 992 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

We affirm the summary denial of claim two on the ground that appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API