Warren v. Warren

In actions for divorce, courts must take such evidence as the nature of the case permits,—circumstantial, direct, or positive,—and bring to bear upon it the experiences and observa*314tian of life, and thus, weighing it with prudence and care, give effect to its just preponderance. Moller v. Moller, 115 N. Y. 466, 22 N. E. 169. The proof in this case is not of a direct, but circumstantial, nature, depending upon a combination of events of such a consistent and reliable character as to form a complete chain of evidence. It appears that the defendant, after separating from his wife, went to board…