Legal Opinion

Cahalane v. Dennery

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The plaintiff in the first action seeks to recover for personal injuries sustained while she was a passenger in the automobile of the defendant. In the second action her father seeks to recover consequential damages. The answers in both cases contain a general denial, an allegation of contributory negligence, and a denial of agency. The last-named defence was waived at the trial. The trial judge allowed the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in each action, and reported the cases to this court. If the direction of the verdicts was correct, judgments are to be entered for the defendant;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crowley v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Curley v. MahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Horneman v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Desroches v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Mulvaney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Dinardi v. HerookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Granger v. LovelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Driscoll v. PaganoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API