Legal Opinion

F. H. Hecht & Co. v. Felenga

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

Plaintiff moves to vacate notice of examination before trial of plaintiff corporation by or through L. Earl Bretz, treasurer of plaintiff corporation. Defendant’s first counterclaim seeks recovery of an alleged balance due as compensation for his services as employee or agent of plaintiff, measured by salary, commissions, and possibly by a share of plaintiff’s business profits. Defendant’s second counterclaim seeks damages resulting from an alleged wrongful discharge. Plaintiff’s opposition is mainly that this action is in equity, and prior to an examination of this character defendant must…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Hathaway v. Clendening Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Shalek v. Jetter Brewing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API