Legal Opinion
Holdampf v. A.C. & S., Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 27, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
We are asked to decide whether the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority) owes a duty of care to plaintiff wife, who was allegedly injured from exposure to *490asbestos dust that plaintiff husband, a Port Authority employee, introduced into the family home on soiled work clothes that plaintiff wife laundered. We conclude that there is no duty of care.
I
Plaintiff John Holdampf was employed by the Port Authority from 1960 to 1996 in various blue-collar positions, working at one time or another in most of the Port Authority’s 26 locations. Over the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Purdy v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Matter of Nyc Asbestos LitigNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls IncorporatedSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- American Insurance v. City of JamestownDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.