Doe v. Moe, Unpublished Decision (10-5-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs-appellants, John Doe, Richard Roe, Michael Moe, Mary Moe, and Regina Scolaro (collectively "appellants") are all alleged victims of sexual abuse by priests employed by defendants-appellees, the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland ("Diocese") and Diocese-operated churches and schools. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.
{¶ 2} In 2002, John Doe, Richard Roe, and Michael Moe brought a negligence action against the Diocese and Parmadale alleging that the Diocese and Parmadale were negligent in protecting them from alleged acts…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.