Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Winebrenner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2009No. Nos. 81279-9; 81280-2PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 In separate prosecutions, petitioners Scott Winebrenner and Jesus Quezada were each found guilty of driving under the influence (DUI) after their deferred prosecutions were revoked by the trial court. In both cases, the court declined to consider offenses committed after the current offense in determining the mandatory *454minimum sentence under RCW 46.61.5055.1 At issue is the meaning of “prior offenses” under the statute and whether a “prior offense” is one that occurs before the arrest for the current offense or before sentencing. Concluding that the statute is ambiguous and subject to two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Agrilink Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of CruzeWashington Supreme Court · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API