Legal Opinion

Barker v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 15, 2011No. 14-09-00750-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant pleaded “guilty” to the offense of failure to comply with registration requirements of the Texas Sex Offender Registration Program (“SORP”) 1 and “true” to an enhancement allegation. The trial court sentenced appellant to six-years’ confinement. In seven issues, appellant contends SORP violates certain constitutional provisions and his punishment was improperly enhanced. We affirm.

I. Background

In 2001, appellant was convicted twice of indecency with a child by contact. As explained below, appellant is required to comply…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Lykos v. FineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Ex parte OdomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Calvin Demetruis Drummond v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  4. Crawford, Milton RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. David Allen Dewald v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API