Barker v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant pleaded “guilty” to the offense of failure to comply with registration requirements of the Texas Sex Offender Registration Program (“SORP”) 1 and “true” to an enhancement allegation. The trial court sentenced appellant to six-years’ confinement. In seven issues, appellant contends SORP violates certain constitutional provisions and his punishment was improperly enhanced. We affirm.
I. Background
In 2001, appellant was convicted twice of indecency with a child by contact. As explained below, appellant is required to comply…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Lykos v. FineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Ex parte OdomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Calvin Demetruis Drummond v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
- Crawford, Milton RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- David Allen Dewald v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.