Legal Opinion

Rossignol v. Estate of Triche

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1876No. 6096PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, parish of La-fourche. Beattie, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This is a suit on an open account and on a promissory, note, secured by mortgage, upon which plaintiff had judgment.

The grounds upon which the defendant asks us for a reversal of tho judgment are —

First — That the account sued on exceeds five hundred dollars, and is only proved by one witness; and

Second — That on cross-examination plaintiff said that the note sued on was given to him as security in part payment of tho accounts sued on; that tho plantation, of Drauzin Tricho owed him $2611 50, and he owed one-half of this sum to Sevin & Gourdain, in New Orleans, and Mr. Drauzin Triche gave him…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Succession of MerenoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Daughdrill v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. J. C. Healy Co. v. BurglassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Thompson v. SteinkampLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API