Legal Opinion

People v. Pico

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 1, 1987No. 3—86—0653, 3—86—0671 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

We have consolidated for opinion the appeals of Jesse Pico and Rudy Mauricio, as they were convicted together following a joint jury trial and seek reversal on similar grounds. These codefendants, who were tried with Paul Mauricio, assert that they were denied their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel because one attorney’s representation of all three codefendants presented a conflict of interest and because the admission of Paul Mauricio’s statement denied them their sixth amendment right to confrontation. We agree and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. People v. OlingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SuttonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. People v. PenningtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API