Haskins v. D'Este
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.
The St. of 1877, c. 163, provides that “ any signature to a written instrument declared on or set forth as a cause of action or ground of defence or set-off, in an action at law, shall be taken as admitted, unless the party sought to be charged thereby shall file in court, within the time allowed for answer, a special denial of the genuineness of such signature and a demand that the party relying thereon shall prove the same at the trial.”
The two defendants were sued in a writ which describes them as “ late copartners under the firm name and style of D’Este & Co.,” and the declaration alleges…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mahaiwe Bank v. DouglassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scholl v. GilmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Graustein v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Munro v. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Talo v. TavaiHigh Court of American Samoa · 1939