Legal Opinion
Nurnberg v. Froehlke
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 9, 1973No. 73 Civ. 21PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner applies for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his release from the United States Army as a conscientious objector and also brings on by way of an order to show cause a motion for preliminary injunction staying his call to active duty status which had been scheduled to take place on January 8, 1973. A preliminary injunction was granted pending final determination on the merits. For reasons detailed below, I find that petitioner qualifies for release as a conscientious objector pursuant to AR 135-25 and that the military contrary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ehlert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Winburn Carson Kessler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Private Michael Leonard Helwick v. Melvin Laird as Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States of America Ex Rel. Neil Bruce Checkman v. Hon. Melvin Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nurnberg v. FroehlkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Nurnberg v. FroehlkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States ex rel. Foster v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974