Legal Opinion

United States v. Alamo-Gutierrez

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 15, 2019No. EP-18-CR-3125-PRMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On this day, the Court considered Defendant Jesus Gerardo Alamo-Gutierrez's *1097[hereinafter "Defendant"] "Motion to Suppress" (ECF No. 21), filed on November 9, 2018; the Government's "Response to Defendant's Motion to Suppress" (ECF No. 29) [hereinafter "Response"], filed on November 29, 2018; and Defendant's "Reply to Government's Response" (ECF No. 32) [hereinafter "Reply"], filed on December 10, 2018, in the above-captioned cause. After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant's Motion to Suppress should be granted in part…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API