Legal Opinion

Russell v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1941No. 5997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

This appeal is upon questions of law and presents two principal questions for our consideration, both related to the action of the trial court upon admission of evidence offered by the defendant. At a previous trial of the case such evidence was admitted by the trial court. Upon consideration of a motion for new trial, the court concluded that it had erroneously admitted such evidence and granted the motion for new trial. Upon the second trial of the case, the trial now here under consideration, the trial court excluded the evidence tendered by the defendant and rendered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dewert v. Cincinnati Milling Machine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Leeds v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Thompson v. National Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willig v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Evans v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of North CarolinaOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API