Legal Opinion

Dahnken, Inc. of Cottonwood v. Marshinsky

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1978No. 15335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Dahnken, Inc. brought this action against defendant Andy Marshinsky, a Wyoming resident, for recission of a contract, or for the balance of the price, on a ring purchased by defendant at its store in Salt Lake County.

Defendant was served as provided in U.C. A.1953, 78-27-25, the so-called Long-Arm Statute. From the granting of defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over him, the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff’s complaint alleges that on December 22, 1976, the defendant came into its store and purchased a ring for which plaintiff’s clerk by mistake…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. Zale CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cate Rental Company, Inc. v. Whalen & CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hanks v. Administrator of the Estate of JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Transwestern General Agency v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mallory Engineering, Inc. v. Ted R. Brown & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nova Mud Corp. v. FletcherDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1986
  3. Producers Livestock Loan Co. v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Dahnken, Inc. of Cottonwood v. MarshinskyUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mallory Engineering, Inc. v. Ted R. Brown & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API