Legal Opinion

Fox v. Liquor Control Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1947No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 43,607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Prior to March, 1946, George T. Pox had a class 0 license under which he obtained the right to operate a bar in the city of Detroit. On or shortly after March 6, 1946, he received a letter or notification from the Michigan liquor control commission which contained the following: “We are in receipt of a violation report which alleges that a license was obtained by you and in your name for the use and benefit of Steve Kafkas, whose name did not appear on the license. This is in violation of your contract with this commission.” -In the same letter he was notified to appear at a specified time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Case v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Shinavier v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ronna Hope Serlin, Inc. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Scally v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Beels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API